I own many synths and other instruments so I’m not against spending money on gear lol. Unrelated but I’ll have a post up soon about why I’m selling my 61 SL MK3 & Maschine MK3 / why midi controllers can be a waste of money. I haven’t had the chance to try another unit but I’ve seen them in many videos and the playing does look fairly effortless. I think there’s probably just a few bad apples floating around out there because I’ve heard varying opinions. If this is a common thing with these, then why aren’t there horrible reviews written everywhere? (Again, that’s why I’m considering it might be a one-off bad unit)ĭoes anyone here have one? And does anyone here also own a real piano or true hammer action instrument to compare it with? Have you played other hammer action keyboards like the Nord Piano or anything else? What are your thoughts on the S88? Because for me, if that’s a regular QC passed production run, it just feels like a bad joke…ĭang sorry to hear! This is an old thread so I can tell you I’ve been back to that store +6 months later to find the S88 still sitting on the floor unsold and feeling just as bad as I remembered it. that’s $1400 pre tax for a midi keyboard with 2 screens that just controls NI software. Now I’m going to give everyone including NI the benefit of the doubt and just think that maybe this was a one-off bad production unit, but damn man. It actually felt like there was just styrofoam stuck under the keys or something to make it feel “weighted” but it was horribly heavy to push any key down, I felt resistance everywhere and it did not feel anything like any Hammer Action that I know of. My old M-Audio Keybed felt better than this thing. I put my hands down on the thing and it’s honestly got to be the worst keybed I’ve ever felt. So, with that in mind, I was ready to be blown away. Sitting a few keyboards over was the KK S88 MK2, I’ve also never played one of those so I went up to it and saw the whopping $1400+ (CAD) price tag on it but then I remembered hearing so many good things about it online when I was looking for a high end midi keyboard. It was great, a really interesting piece of gear and I see why so many people love it. Today I was in the Music Store and they had a Nord Piano 5 sitting there, and personally I’ve never sat down and played one, so I did. But they are known for having less than desirable action, I did the best I could with that thing and it plays very smoothly now, but it still feels like a Rhodes. I recently got a 1973 Rhodes MK1, a beautiful instrument that I restored inside and out, it’s my baby. I ended up chosing the Novation 61SL MK3 in the end but anyways. Okay so let me give this some context, I’m not here to shit on NI, I actually like their products a lot, I use a Maschine now in my daily workflow and the S61 was a big contender for my main controller.
0 Comments
The Caffe Mocha and Caramel Macchiato flavors are sweet and creamy, with a strong coffee taste and a hint of chocolate or caramel. Each bottle is made with Starbucks espresso coffee, which is known for its bold and rich taste. Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics are known for its delicious and rich flavors. Most of the bottles are a 40 fl oz size bottle, but the amounts above are for a 12 fl oz serving. The product is available in several different flavors and all flavors are reported as having the same caffeine amount. These drinks were first introduced in the market as Starbucks Discoveries and later rebranded as Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics. Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics is a line of bottled, ready-to-drink coffee beverages that are made and distributed by PepsiCo on behalf of Starbucks. Additionally, the price point may be higher compared to other ready-to-drink coffee beverages, and certain flavors may have limited availability. However, the high sugar content and potential side effects of caffeine should be considered before consuming these drinks. The high caffeine content and delicious flavors make them a great choice for those looking for a pick-me-up. Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics are a popular and convenient option for coffee lovers looking for a quick energy boost on the go. Starbucks Iced Pumpkin Spice Latte (limited): 375 mg per 40 oz bottleĬomparison of caffeine in Starbucks Doubleshot Espresso Starbucks Caffeinated Drinks.Starbucks Iced Peppermint Mocha (limited): 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.Starbucks Iced Skinny Vanilla Latte: 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.Starbucks Iced Skinny Caramel Latte: 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.Starbucks Iced Vanilla Latte: 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.Starbucks Iced Caramel Macchiato: 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.Starbucks Iced Caffe Mocha: 375 mg per 40 oz bottle.oz bottles around – these have around 145mg of caffeine in them. The volume varies depending on your preference. All flavors contain the same amount of caffeine. There are also other variations such as Starbucks latte macchiato and cafe au lasts. Some flavors include vanilla mocha, caramel macchiato, milk chocolate, hazelnut cappuccino, etc. Starbucks Iced Espresso is an iced coffee drink made of espresso beans and served chilled. Brewed Starbucks Espresso Coffee (Water, Coffee)Ĭaffeine in Flavors of Starbucks Iced Espresso.Ingredients in Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics Caffeine information How Much Caffeine is in Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics? Yes, Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics contains 125mg of caffeine per 12 fl oz and 10.42 mg per fl oz (35.22mg/100ml). As with any beverage, it’s best to consume these drinks in moderation and keep an eye on your own tolerance for caffeine.ĭoes Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics have caffeine? In summary, Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics are a convenient and delicious way to get a caffeine boost on the go, but it’s important to be aware of the high caffeine content and sugar levels. So, if you’re watching your sugar intake, you might want to consider other options or dilute it with water or ice. Starbucks Iced Espresso Classics are also high in sugar, with 30 grams of sugar per 12 ounces for a total of 190 calories per bottle. People who are sensitive to caffeine should be mindful of the amount they consume. Caffeine can cause jitteriness, anxiety, and difficulty sleeping, so it’s important to consume these drinks in moderation. It’s important to note that caffeine can affect people differently, so it’s always best to know your own tolerance. Additionally, a 14 fl oz bottle contains about 145 mg of caffeine. The caffeine content varies depending on the flavor, but all flavors have the same amount of caffeine. Each 12 fl oz bottle contains approximately 125 mg of caffeine, which is roughly equivalent to a cup of coffee. One of the key features of these drinks is their high caffeine content. These drinks are available in a variety of flavors, including Caffe Mocha, Caramel Macchiato, Vanilla Latte, Skinny Caramel Latte, Skinny Vanilla Latte, Peppermint Mocha (limited), and Pumpkin Spice Latte (limited). I think the industry is moving that way, to be honest I really do. You have to have those things if you’re working in that way, otherwise, you’re going to lose moments. We had a very good focus puller who finds you where you are, and we had a very good cameraman and DoP. So you don’t have to hit your mark with the exactness or precision of a more traditional lighting setup? Is my understanding correct? That made it feel like a very different thing that I was working on and I enjoyed it. The camera was roving in a very free-flowing way, and Chloé was shooting with a lot of natural light, so there weren’t massively long setups to do with lighting. For a start, I was in a modern costume, a contemporary costume. If I compare it to some of the work I’ve done in the past, “Here’s the wide, here’s the medium, here’s the close, everything’s on a track, or here’s your mark.” With Thrones, for example, you’re wrapped up in a big cloak, so it all becomes very restrictive and you’ve got to work within those parameters and those restrictions. There were a lot of single-camera roving shots. Since Chloé tends to shoot with natural light, how does that affect your job in terms of your positions or movements? But this one felt right for a number of reasons, personally, and it just piqued my interest as an actor. I’ve turned down a big role in a superhero-style franchise before because the character wasn’t right. Then it really relies on who the character is and whether you’re interested in that character. But I’ve been a Marvel fan for a long time, and when that call comes, your ears do prick up. There was - and there is - a hesitancy after you’ve been in something for so long that is a franchise piece, or a recurring story, to do that again. It’s a good question because I guess the phone call for this came about a year and a half or so after the end of Thrones airing. So what was on your mind as you weighed this decision? I have to admit that I was quite surprised to see you join another massive franchise so soon after Game of Thrones ended, but if you’re going to commit to another franchise, Marvel is certainly the place to be. He was humanity or he represented humanity, really. I was only in it for a limited period of time, so I kind of needed the audience to warm to him. Well, Kit, you did your job quite well because you left me wanting more of Dane Whitman. Then he addresses the possibility of reuniting with another Thrones co-star and dear friend, Emilia Clarke, in the MCU. In a recent conversation with THR, Harington also discusses Zhao’s affinity for natural light and how that impacts his performance. And with, it’s very palpable that this sword, this blade, has an addictive pull on him, and I find that really interesting.” I’m fascinated by the idea that any character in any story is driven by some addiction to something. “All I know is that when I came on board, they said, ‘There’s a really interesting future for this character, and if you read up about him, there are many different ways we could go with him.’ And that intrigues me. If they have ideas about where my character goes, I’m not privy to it,” Harington shares. “There is no roadmap that I know of at the moment. While Harington doesn’t yet know the particulars of Whitman’s future, he can’t help but analyze the Eternals post-credit scene that features his character and a family heirloom. For fans of Game of Thrones, to see two major roles from that world in another one feels like a bigger thing than it does to me and Richard.” “Our closeness is not built in front of camera it’s built behind camera. So it’s strange,” Harington tells The Hollywood Reporter. “I’ve said this a few times, but it’s true: we really didn’t have a lot of time on set together on Game of Thrones. Sony Pictures Quarterly Profit Drops to $115M |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |